Menu
For years, many survivors were told their time to take legal action had simply run out. A missed deadline should not decide whether someone gets justice. That reality is changing with California’s Assembly Bill 250. For survivors and those questioning whether they still have legal options, this shift introduces new possibilities. If you are wondering whether your experience may now qualify, taking a closer look at Assembly Bill 250 is essential.
Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 250 into law on October 13, 2025, with it becoming effective on January 1, 2026. This new bill makes it possible for adult survivors of sexual assault in California to seek justice. Survivors can seek damages from the individual perpetrator and the private institution that took steps to cover up the incidents. This includes private corporations, private universities, medical groups, or religious organizations. It reopens the window for civil litigation that was previously closed due to the statute of limitations expiring. The window isn’t open forever, though. Survivors have until December 31, 2027 to file their claim.
Time limits in the legal system are meant to encourage timely claims. Statutes of limitations do not always account for how trauma affects a person’s ability to come forward. Many individuals spend years processing what happened before they are ready to speak about it, let alone pursue legal action. By that point, the legal deadline has often passed. AB 250 addresses that disconnect.
A core element of AB 250 is the cover-up requirement. For a claim to be successful, survivors must be able to show that the institution failed to prevent abuse and then, either attempted to or, actively hid known abuse when it was made aware of it.
For example, a company could actively transfer an accused employee from one department or location to another. This could go against the company’s policy that would require an investigation and possible termination.
Another common cover-up tactic is to pressure the victim. They may be pushed to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs). There could be a conditional settlement offer that requires the victim to never discuss the abuse.
In egregious cases, the organization could have actively destroyed evidence of the abuse or cover-up. This includes destroying personnel files, internal reports, and investigation documents.
While this is a renewed window for many survivors, it isn’t all-encompassing. There are limits placed on who can file a claim, against whom the claim can be filed, and the types of claims that can be made in the lawsuit.
Public entities are excluded from AB 250. Claims can only be made against private individuals and organizations. If a survivor has a claim against a government entity, there are separate rules that must be followed.
Survivors also need to file their claim before the bill’s deadline. Otherwise, the window closes again, and they wouldn’t be able to file their claim. While the two-year window seems like a long time, it’s important to act quickly. It can take time for an attorney to gather the necessary information and evidence to support a claim. Not waiting to speak with a lawyer ensures survivors are in the best position to seek justice.
The passing of Assembly Bill 250 has far-reaching impacts for survivors, employers, and institutions. For survivors, there is a renewed opportunity to seek justice for the wrongs they have experienced. While there isn’t a guaranteed outcome, having the opportunity to hold their perpetrator accountable is significant. By not having any requirement of previous reporting or police complaint, survivors who felt like they couldn’t come forward before can do so now.
Employers and private organizations also need to be aware of AB 250. They can be named in a survivor’s civil litigation. Their litigation exposure is increased. Taking a proactive approach can help them understand their litigation risk. Reviewing past complaints, verifying documentation, and internal policies can be helpful. It’s important to take a critical eye to historical conduct that could lead to a cover-up allegation.
With Assembly Bill 250 now in effect, California law provides a temporary chance to bring forward claims that previously had no legal pathway. With strict deadlines and detailed legal standards involved, timing and preparation matter. ADZ Law represents clients in complex civil litigation and approaches sensitive matters with care, discretion, and a clear legal strategy.
If you believe this law may affect your rights, contact ADZ Law to discuss your options before the filing window closes.
Our Firm Speaks
© 2026 ADZ Law, LLP
| View Our Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm
